They would need to click a link or open an attachment for anything to happen. To date there hasn't been any known harm caused by a Mac user simply reading an infected e-mail.
#CLAMXAV VS AVAST FOR MAC#
This isn't really a major issue for Mac users. If it were to delete such messages, the mailbox index would be corrupted and have to be rebuilt. Infected attachments can also be quarantined or deleted without messing anything up. There isn't an easy way to extract individual messages and you aren't going to want to delete the entire mailbox or database.ĬlamXAV can work with Apple Mail to move infected messages to a quarantine mailbox which the user can then inspect and empty. There is a big problem involved in trying to check an e-mail database that doesn't store them as individual files (e.g. ClamAV started out as such software and there are some add-ons list on this page under Third Party ClamAV Tools. There are some, but mostly used by e-mail servers to prevent your ever receiving infected e-mails. You would have to click on a link or open an attachment for anything bad to happen and there are other means of preventing harm from doing that.
I don't believe either scans incoming e-mail, but there are currently no threats to macOS from simply reading an e-mail.
#CLAMXAV VS AVAST INSTALL#
Malwarebytes scans take fare less time to do a manual scan because it isn't looking at every file on your hard drive that it can read the way ClamXAV does.ĬlamXAV does check for Windows and Linux malware if that's important to you, but if you are running Windows on your Mac it's best to install Windows malware software in that partition or VM for accurate results. They are basically looking for the same malware types so you won't find a lot of differences there.ĬlamXAV allows for a daily schedule scan which Malwarebytes has not added yet.īoth do quick scanning of selected areas where malware is known to exist, but ClamXAV v3 that just came out yesterday now does this for the entire hard drive. I frequently collaborate with both developers and have been somewhat involved with the design and testing of both apps for many years now.Īs far as features are concerned, both web sites seem to adequately explain such features so that you can compare them for yourself and they both have trial versions which will tell you exactly what their user options are. I have seen issues if both are attempting to access the same new or changed file simultaneously, but your experience could be different. I've always used both ClamXAV and Malwarebytes for Mac (to include the earlier apps that it's based upon) without issue as long as only one of them has background scanning (Real-Time or Sentry) enabled.
0 kommentar(er)
